covering our community

Genetically modified food: should you know?

Major food companies such as PepsiCo and Wal-mart who opposed legislation to label genetically modified food products in November met in January to discuss labeling genetically modified organisms [GMOs], as reported in the New York Times.

Discussion comes after these companies spent over 40 million dollars campaigning against Proposition 37 in California.

Proposition 37, also known as The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act, supported labeling food containing genetically modified ingredients. According to the proposition, the effects caused by altering the genes of plants are not sufficiently studied therefore consumers should have the “right to know what’s in your food.”

The proposition was defeated with 51 percent of voters against labeling.

Though other states are considering similar legislation, these major food companies have not expressed interest in financing opposition like they did in California.

University of Portland associate professor of economics William Barnes believes the change of heart in these companies has to do with the consumer’s demand for transparency.

“The risk of hurt to companies decreases by being transparent,” Barnes said. “Companies don’t want to be seen as evil.”

UP Junior Kelsey Robison recalls seeing significantly more anti-proposition 37 advertisements than support when she returned home for fall break. She said the opposition claimed labeling products with genetically modified ingredients would hurt farmers and increase costs “exponentially.”

The opposition to Proposition 37 argues labeling GMOs will unnecessarily shake consumer confidence and raise food prices.

Barnes agrees that the impact that labeling GMOs will have on the economy is not a question of “if” but of “how much.” However, Barnes believes the change in consumer purchasing will happen slowly over time rather than a sudden dramatic switch in purchasing.

Barnes believes that it is economically safer for companies to be upfront about what is in their food.

“GMOs is a tricky one,” Barnes said. “In terms of economics, I would take the cautionary principle – error on the side of caution. People are rightfully concerned.”

If legislation were to pass requiring genetically modified food to be labeled, Robison says she would try to avoid purchasing it.

“I try really hard as a college student to eat local and organic as much as possible,” Robison said. “There aren’t long term studies [on GMOs] and there’s no way to get info so I want to be cautious. If I have the means to buy it I would definitely do that.”

Robison believes her fellow college students aren’t as informed about genetically modified food or legislation regarding labeling.

“Definitely when it was around election time [peer college students] were just like ‘What the heck is a GMO?’” Robison said. “People don’t know, they’re not informed, or they don’t care.”

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Genetically modified food: should you know?”

  1. richycarrillo10

    Great article. I completely agree that companies should become more transparent when it comes to the food we consume. I believe it is good to buy locally in order to fully be knowledgeable of whats in our food and hopefully companies will begin to label without worrying how much business they will lose.

    Reply
  2. Karen

    Well written! Thanks for sharing. I’ve been boycotting every “No on 37” contributor and/or parent company, and it truly isn’t easy to do. I’ve given up my Safeway card (their parent company), and have had to give up several of my organic brands like Larabar, Cascadian Farms, and Silk, all now owned by giant agribusiness that supports GMOs. It’s been truly disappointing to see how many organic brands caved in and sold themselves to the giants, and traded the philosophy that started them for the almighty dollar. Let’s hope that I-522 in Washington passes!

    Reply
  3. Kate Stringer

    Karen that is an admirable but admittedly difficult task to undertake. I am also looking forward to seeing the result of the Washington I-522 vote. I have a feeling that growing awareness might result in a more favorable outcome, especially when large companies realize the difficulty in supporting a practice that more people are finding abominable.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: